But Blumenberg’s book makes all the things that Heidegger made . His attempt to legitimate the modern age is an attempt to defend all the. ity and modernism, that the English translation of Hans Blumenberg’s The. Legitimacy of the Modern Age comes as an especially welcome event.3 For al-. which launched the Lowith-Blumenberg debate over the nature of secularization and the legitimacy of the modern age. ‘ The widespread discussion the book.
|Published (Last):||23 May 2013|
|PDF File Size:||9.36 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||20.1 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
The Indifference of Epicuruss Gods.
Hans Blumenberg: The Legitimacy of the Modern Age
Austin Wge – – Thesis Eleven 94 1: Modernity has not forged new gods: The hermeneutic of secularization is, therefore, in and of itself structurally delegitimizing regardless of content from the moment it repudiates the claim modernity makes regarding the novelty of its act in order to bring it back to a heritage which it cannot discard conversely, to show the legitimacy of modernity would, for Blumenberg, certainly not mean legitimizing it through heritage or as heritage.
The latter begins in the first part and continues in the books that follow, with an analysis of the notions of Gnosticism, intellectual curiosity, and epochal threshold.
The recovery of paradise was not supposed to yield a transparent and familiar reality but only a tamed blumenbery obedient one. The Enlightenment, as Blumenberg understands it, does not so much celebrate the triumph of rationality as set out in modrn discerning and concerned fashion the problems engendered by this new rationality. To say that B is the secularization of A and it is only at this semantic level that the notion of secularization acquires a transitive useis to say that B is A minus something—or that B is A deprived of the dimension of transcendence.
Heidegger, the great legitiamcy of nostalgia, kept gesturing towards those pre-Socratics whose one-liners left most room for retranslation or, as he put it, the most open space for Being.
According to this lrgitimacy, the present is the presentation of an alienated truth—with the ambiguity upon legitimac the Heideggerian Ereignis draws, namely, that that which is hidden is simultaneously revealed, revealed as hidden, etc. The critique advanced by Blumenberg is not directed towards the very descriptive thesis by which it is claimed that a process of secularization has taken place in the modern era.
This borrowing also creates a debt in its turn, even if that debt is more often than not difficult to express in normative terms: At the moderrn of the controversy is the question of how modern science on the one hand and rational law on the other hand can be differentiated as autonomous realms. Julian Joseph Potter – – Thesis Eleven 1: Abstract and Keywords The opposition between religiosity and secularism is the key to both a discourse-historical epochal threshold and the question of the self-understanding of Western modernity.
Lsgitimacy, Blumenberg argues,the idea of progress always implies a process at work blumebberg history, operating through an internallogic that ultimately expresses human choices and is legitimized by human self-assertion, by man’sresponsibility for his own fate. From this point of view, modernity does indeed constitute an escape from the theological, and not a transformation of the theological into a form of mundane theology.
Or, if not exactly a champion, at least somebody whose upbeat history we can cite against those who revel in belatedness, and against those who fear that xge big sweeping geistesgeschichtlich stories will reinforce our bad old totalising urges. In any case, if he is, he notes the impossibility of returning to the politics of the old theocratic schemata. Midern thus does not consist of an affirmation of the political, but, on the contrary, abandons the absolutism of the political, which is strategically asserted in the beginning only in order to combat another absolutism on equal terms—that of the religious.
It sees blumenbeg one eye of faith and the other of reason. Those of us who agree with Nietzsche and Heidegger that the philosophical tradition is pretty well played out, with Carlyle and Foucault that the arts and the sciences have not been unmixed blessings, and with Marxists that we legitomacy not believe what the lying capitalist legiitmacy tells us about the modern world, but whose highest hopes are still those of Mill, now have a champion.
The Legitimacy of the Modern Age. This self-understanding is in a sense the very truth of the phenomenon: From this point of view, the virtues of the citizen are those of the Christian, namely humility, obedience and patience. Request removal from index. There is a significant difference between the simple notion of secularization and the general expression, just cited, which attempts to explain modernity in its entirety.
My library Help Advanced Book Search.
Sign in to use this feature. The Enlightenment has been a favourite target ever since Adorno blamed it for Los Angeles. This act peculiar to modernity consists in the self-affirmation blimenberg self-positioning of Man and his techno-rational power, understood as a demiurgic power not limited to the predetermined world of possibilities, but independently capable of opening itself to a universe of possibilities.
Such a hermeneutic is also a hermeneutic of suspicion. Blumenberg criticizes none of these uses, techniques, or arguments. Most intellectuals still think that the most decisive step of all came in the 17th and 18th centuries, when we got out from under prejudice, superstition and the belief in God.
Contents Status of the Concept. Please subscribe or login to access full text content. Log In Register for Online Access. The Retraction of the Socratic Turning. Contact us for rights and issues inquiries. Let us, however, stay with this final point. Blumejberg we want, on this view, is acknowledgment of discontinuity and open-endedness and contingency, rather than either nostalgia or exuberance.
The Legitimacy of the Modern Age – Hans Blumenberg – Google Books
Hans Blumenberg Thierry Gontier Voegelin. It is, moreover, impossible for us ever to escape from the theological. However, in reality, those values were not posited as absolutes by modernity elgitimacy. We are, they say, trapped in a conceptual scheme which distorts the way things really are.
The Legitimacy of the Modern Age.
Justifications of Curiosity as Preparation for the. The History of Psychological Categories. Here Blumenberg seems to be saying that, just as the history of science represents Aristotle as talking about inertia even though he did not believe there was such a thing, so we must read the ancients and the medievals by our own lights. Given this state of intellectual play, about the last thing one would expect to come down the pike is a great ldgitimacy history of the course of European thought, built on the Hegel-Heidegger scale, which has Francis Bacon as one of its heroes, speaks well of the Enlightenment of all periodsand suggests that the future lies of all directions ahead.
Ward, Polity, Bodmint Cornwall, pp. The search for a set of instruments for man that would be usable in any possible world provides the criterion lbumenberg the elementary exertions of the modern age; the mathematising and the materialising of nature. Ockham urged that there was no reason knowable to man why God actualised this possible world rather than another.
He gave it an answer that went to the root of the formation of the age that had come to an end.
It is an indication of courage, not of weakness or of self-deception. Home Articles Hans Blumenberg: