Labor and Monopoly Capital is one of the most influential books of our time,and it Harry Braverman () drew on his rich experience as pipefitter. Review: Harry Braverman. Labor and. Monopoly Capital: The Degradation of. Work in the Twentieth Century. New. York: Monthly Review Press, ,. pp. This widely acclaimed book, first published in , was a classic from its first day in print. Written in a direct, inviting way by Harry Braverman, whose year.
|Published (Last):||20 January 2006|
|PDF File Size:||7.55 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||8.85 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Labor and Monopoly Capital: The Degradation of Work in the Twentieth Century
Amazon Inspire Digital Educational Resources. Just today, I told one of my close friends how to deal with ocular migraines from stress I’m dealing from experience. High levels of walkouts, strikes, turnovers, and absenteeism caused them to introduce new measures of “job enlargement. Can we ever change anything without understanding it first? Showing of 16 reviews. I bought this several years ago, but I had left it on my shelf for too long, one of those books I know I should have mlnopoly, but other books just kept getting in the way.
Trivia About Labor and Monopol The Degradation of Labor” is an update of Marx’s “Capital. In attempting to give concrete meaning to the abstraction “fairness,” it would make just as much if not more sense to express a fair day’s work as the amount of labor necessary to add to the product a value equal to the worker’s pay; under such conditions, of course, profit would be impossible.
In all it’s gruesome, ugly, glory. Principles of Marxian Political Economy. Modern technology would eventually eliminate the tedium and alienation associated with assembly-line work.
Also included are two rare articles by Braverman that add much to our understanding of the book: There was bravermwn problem filtering reviews right now.
Notes on “Labor and Monopoly Capital,” by Harry Braverman | Chris Wright –
If doing one part of the overall production cycle involves monopolt of skill, then you will organise the process to ensure that the high value labour needed for that part of the job will only be employed doing that part of the job – and none of the other less skilled parts of the job. This work started “the labor process debate” finding that there was a decline in the use of skilled labor as a result of managers strategy for control.
This widely acclaimed work, first published inoverturned the reigning ideologies of academic sociology and became the standard text for many basic areas of sociological inquiry, including the science of managerial control, the relationship of technological innovation to social class, and the eradication of skill from work under capitalism.
Let’s think more about the world we live in. Just hardy moment while we sign you in to your Goodreads account. There’s a problem loading this menu right now. ThompsonAlfred ChandlerJ.
Lyndall Urwick, Management Pioneer: My son, a craftsman, tells me that this has happened in the building industry. Don’t know how things capitla to where they are but are fed up with it?
And it is quite obvious that common elements unite them. However Harry Braverman insisted here that human relations did not replace Taylorism but rather that both approaches were complementary —Taylorism determining the actual organisation of the work snd, and human relations helping to adapt the workers to the new procedures.
Learn more about Amazon Giveaway. Labor and Monopoly Capital is one of the most influential books of our time,and it deserves to be. One commentator said, “We have created too many dumb jobs for which we don’t have enough dumb people.
I guess you could call it a kind of pyrrhic victory that we’re now over a decade into the 21st century, and Braverman’s argument is more relevant than ever. Amazon Music Stream millions of songs.
Jan 12, Mike rated it it was amazing Shelves: Braverman’s book is a treasure trove of knowledge on the work process under capitalism. I found it a little boring.
Feb 21, Manish Gupta rated it it was amazing. Labor and Monopoly Capital: But why does Braverman focus on an idea so old? Top Reviews Most recent Top Reviews. The method of Foster’s argument is a history of the structuring and control of labor from Frederic Taylor nad Ford and the modern assembly line. Description Additional information Description Preface by Paul Sweezy Foreword by John Bellamy Foster This widely acclaimed work, first published inoverturned the reigning ideologies of academic sociology and became the standard text for many basic areas of sociological inquiry, including the science of managerial control, the relationship of technological innovation to social class, and the eradication of skill from work under capitalism.
The scientists and engineers who push the technology forward? Learn more about Amazon Prime. To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up. It I had my doubts that this would be interesting, but in fact it is an easy, and excellent read, not at all the dull one you might expect by the monoopoly. The same process Braverman described 40 years ago is happening now in our hospitals.
Braverman shows that, with all the changes in the work-force and technology, that did not happen. See all 16 reviews.
Now, crafts people are expensive — their labour is expensive — so, one of the things capitalism does is to reduce the complexity of the series of tasks needed capial produce something down to a series of simple and highly repeatable ones. But of course this whole line of literature related to the effects of “monopoly capital” ignored and frustratingly, doesn’t even address Schumpeter, and we’ve seen it not borne out.